<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fort Bragg Barracks Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=fort-bragg-barracks-interview</link>
	<description>The Web’s Leading Military Blog Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 02:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-44435</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-44435</guid>
		<description>Sorry I had a few typing errors!  I&#039;m an old-timer with limited skill sets, but I do support our troops and while my comments will mke both sides angry, many will know they are mostly true!

Thanks and God Bless all of our troops and the job they are doing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I had a few typing errors!  I&#8217;m an old-timer with limited skill sets, but I do support our troops and while my comments will mke both sides angry, many will know they are mostly true!</p>
<p>Thanks and God Bless all of our troops and the job they are doing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-44434</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-44434</guid>
		<description>while it&#039;s true that there are still a lot of barracks in poor condition; it&#039;s not the root of the problem.

There are several factors involved in this issue and &quot;throwing tax dollars at the problem&quot; is not going to solve the problem by it&#039;s self.

The Army has failed to learn from the other services that have programs that work.  Instead they continue to be hard headed and try an re-invent the wheel!

If the Airforce and Navy have programs that work and have for many years, why create new software and procedures when there are already ones in place that work (available to any DOD service to copy / share.

The Army is being re-active instead of pro-active!  There is no doubt in my mind that the Army will still have problems and be in the news for the next 20 years (concerning barracks and quality of life).  They just refuse to change.  sure they have a lot of news about change and new programs, but management can not correct the problem with correcting the source of the problem, which is the soildier failing to take care of what they have!

More import is the fact that soldiers are not held accountable for standards.  Even the ones that have been given new and wonderful quarters have destoryed them!

Keep in mind the the average age of soldiers living in the barracks is about 22 years old!
These young men and women are the best soldiers that our nation has ever seen! they learn quicker and have stronger skill sets. At the same time they do not a basic life skills!  Meaning that they do not have the motovation to clean-up after themselves!  They wait till very piece of clothing they own is dirty before doing the wash!  The showrs they use would make you sick!

Unless we give our military folks laundry service and room service (hire maids), or unless the military gets tough! This will never change.

  So why doesn&#039;t the military address this issue?  Retention!  The Army leadership feels it has to have it units (men) confoned to quarters on-base and living in bulidings that are 200% occupied per DOD standards (90sf per man for E4 and below, and 135SF for E-5).

Next time you see something on video, ask yourself, if this was management failing to provide quality quarters or soldiers tearing-up what was provided to them!

For the Army to say that it&#039;s doing something is shameful!  Why?  first of all the idea of unit integerity needs to go away now!  I&#039;ts actually better for soldiers to interact and live with soldiers from ither units.  this issue in it&#039;s-self it the main cause for the barracks being crowed and also for othe bulidings to be hardly occupied!

Make the chain of command spend a week in these barracks two to a room!  Let them see how the troops act after hours.  Many of them have never been in the barracks!  Those that have can count the number of times on two hands!  the chain of command must be active in the barracks areas (common areas).  This includes after hours duty sections and duty officers.

We have not seen the last of this problem!  It&#039;s time to take action on the few that are tearing-up the facilities! At the same time stop the over crowding of barracks now!  Comply with DOD standards now!  Even if you have to pay BAH to all of the senior E-3 and E-4 soldiers!  2013 will be here soon!  The Army will not be ready, there is no way that they will meet DOD standards even by 2020!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>while it&#8217;s true that there are still a lot of barracks in poor condition; it&#8217;s not the root of the problem.</p>
<p>There are several factors involved in this issue and &#8220;throwing tax dollars at the problem&#8221; is not going to solve the problem by it&#8217;s self.</p>
<p>The Army has failed to learn from the other services that have programs that work.  Instead they continue to be hard headed and try an re-invent the wheel!</p>
<p>If the Airforce and Navy have programs that work and have for many years, why create new software and procedures when there are already ones in place that work (available to any DOD service to copy / share.</p>
<p>The Army is being re-active instead of pro-active!  There is no doubt in my mind that the Army will still have problems and be in the news for the next 20 years (concerning barracks and quality of life).  They just refuse to change.  sure they have a lot of news about change and new programs, but management can not correct the problem with correcting the source of the problem, which is the soildier failing to take care of what they have!</p>
<p>More import is the fact that soldiers are not held accountable for standards.  Even the ones that have been given new and wonderful quarters have destoryed them!</p>
<p>Keep in mind the the average age of soldiers living in the barracks is about 22 years old!<br />
These young men and women are the best soldiers that our nation has ever seen! they learn quicker and have stronger skill sets. At the same time they do not a basic life skills!  Meaning that they do not have the motovation to clean-up after themselves!  They wait till very piece of clothing they own is dirty before doing the wash!  The showrs they use would make you sick!</p>
<p>Unless we give our military folks laundry service and room service (hire maids), or unless the military gets tough! This will never change.</p>
<p>  So why doesn&#8217;t the military address this issue?  Retention!  The Army leadership feels it has to have it units (men) confoned to quarters on-base and living in bulidings that are 200% occupied per DOD standards (90sf per man for E4 and below, and 135SF for E-5).</p>
<p>Next time you see something on video, ask yourself, if this was management failing to provide quality quarters or soldiers tearing-up what was provided to them!</p>
<p>For the Army to say that it&#8217;s doing something is shameful!  Why?  first of all the idea of unit integerity needs to go away now!  I&#8217;ts actually better for soldiers to interact and live with soldiers from ither units.  this issue in it&#8217;s-self it the main cause for the barracks being crowed and also for othe bulidings to be hardly occupied!</p>
<p>Make the chain of command spend a week in these barracks two to a room!  Let them see how the troops act after hours.  Many of them have never been in the barracks!  Those that have can count the number of times on two hands!  the chain of command must be active in the barracks areas (common areas).  This includes after hours duty sections and duty officers.</p>
<p>We have not seen the last of this problem!  It&#8217;s time to take action on the few that are tearing-up the facilities! At the same time stop the over crowding of barracks now!  Comply with DOD standards now!  Even if you have to pay BAH to all of the senior E-3 and E-4 soldiers!  2013 will be here soon!  The Army will not be ready, there is no way that they will meet DOD standards even by 2020!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sgt. Gutter</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-44317</link>
		<dc:creator>Sgt. Gutter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 00:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-44317</guid>
		<description>A few interesting perspectives:

- Have the barracks being intentionally unmaintained as part of military experience? I mean, did the boot camp been set up like a sewer as part of hazing ritual to toughen up soldier? After all, military has been known for using unconventional tactics to train soldiers by putting them in inhumane conditions.

- When the Army has &#039;done a lot in the last two weeks to fix up the barracks&#039; after the video leak, does that include punishment against those who are responsible for leaking the video footage? After all, the videographer are technically filming classified information and leaking military secret to the general public, and that can be interpreted as treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few interesting perspectives:</p>
<p>- Have the barracks being intentionally unmaintained as part of military experience? I mean, did the boot camp been set up like a sewer as part of hazing ritual to toughen up soldier? After all, military has been known for using unconventional tactics to train soldiers by putting them in inhumane conditions.</p>
<p>- When the Army has &#8216;done a lot in the last two weeks to fix up the barracks&#8217; after the video leak, does that include punishment against those who are responsible for leaking the video footage? After all, the videographer are technically filming classified information and leaking military secret to the general public, and that can be interpreted as treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41904</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 20:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41904</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s good to hear that this is being addressed. 

Here&#039;s another point of view. 

In the Navy, the Executive Officer inspects berthing (barracks) every day.  Yes, everyone up and down the chain is responsible but requiring the number 2 person in the command to put eyeballs on the living conditions (daily) of the most junior sailors (troops) ensures that this doesn&#039;t happen. 

Also in the Navy, we assign like units to take care of all the details for returning units. A stateside unit (battallion for battalion) should have been assigned and held accountable to ensure details like an abandoned (for 15 months) barracks building was up to speed prior to the deployers return. 

Something like peeling paint for a returning unit is not &quot;a little thing.&quot; All these items could have been addressed given the right leadership (read: doesn&#039;t cost a lot of $$). Just about anyone could have picked up a paint brush. How about a welcome home sign?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to hear that this is being addressed. </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another point of view. </p>
<p>In the Navy, the Executive Officer inspects berthing (barracks) every day.  Yes, everyone up and down the chain is responsible but requiring the number 2 person in the command to put eyeballs on the living conditions (daily) of the most junior sailors (troops) ensures that this doesn&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>Also in the Navy, we assign like units to take care of all the details for returning units. A stateside unit (battallion for battalion) should have been assigned and held accountable to ensure details like an abandoned (for 15 months) barracks building was up to speed prior to the deployers return. </p>
<p>Something like peeling paint for a returning unit is not &#8220;a little thing.&#8221; All these items could have been addressed given the right leadership (read: doesn&#8217;t cost a lot of $$). Just about anyone could have picked up a paint brush. How about a welcome home sign?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41479</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41479</guid>
		<description>Hate to tell you Chuck but you&#039;re WRONG on married soldiers not being allowed to stay in barrack&#039;s. It depends on where they&#039;re stationed, say oversea&#039;s like we are, when the married soldier is waiting for housing and waiting for his family and there is ROOM, he has a right to have a room in the barrack&#039;s. 

As for what has happened, if there&#039;s been an issue since 2002, this is above and beyond the NCO&#039;s, this is up into the brass&#039;s failure to take care of the soldiers, once again. Keep blaming the guys who are time and time again fighting for their soldiers but keep getting doors slammed in their faces. The realities is that many of the NCO&#039;s at one point in their career lived in barrack&#039;s, while the brass even if they did live in barrack&#039;s always had the best given to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hate to tell you Chuck but you&#8217;re WRONG on married soldiers not being allowed to stay in barrack&#8217;s. It depends on where they&#8217;re stationed, say oversea&#8217;s like we are, when the married soldier is waiting for housing and waiting for his family and there is ROOM, he has a right to have a room in the barrack&#8217;s. </p>
<p>As for what has happened, if there&#8217;s been an issue since 2002, this is above and beyond the NCO&#8217;s, this is up into the brass&#8217;s failure to take care of the soldiers, once again. Keep blaming the guys who are time and time again fighting for their soldiers but keep getting doors slammed in their faces. The realities is that many of the NCO&#8217;s at one point in their career lived in barrack&#8217;s, while the brass even if they did live in barrack&#8217;s always had the best given to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41478</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41478</guid>
		<description>The reason your married son had to un-ass the barracks is because married soldiers are NOT ALLOWED to live in the barracks.  They are paid BAH, which is a non-taxable housing allowance.   The reason there isn&#039;t enough room in the barracks is because someone wasn&#039;t doing their job, and was letting married soldiers live in the barracks.  
Even if separated from their spouse, because they draw BAH, the regs are very clear on this.  Unless the soldier is mobilized or deployed, married in the barracks is a non-starter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason your married son had to un-ass the barracks is because married soldiers are NOT ALLOWED to live in the barracks.  They are paid BAH, which is a non-taxable housing allowance.   The reason there isn&#8217;t enough room in the barracks is because someone wasn&#8217;t doing their job, and was letting married soldiers live in the barracks.<br />
Even if separated from their spouse, because they draw BAH, the regs are very clear on this.  Unless the soldier is mobilized or deployed, married in the barracks is a non-starter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: k9gs</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41475</link>
		<dc:creator>k9gs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41475</guid>
		<description>Kudos to the Dad, I do have concern his son will pay a price. This isn&#039;t the NCO&#039;s fault, the buildings are old and discussion but not action has been going on for years.  It is the top brass&#039;s fault.  Buildings go up here in town in a matter of weeks complete start to finish, no excuse whatsoever for these guys to come home and live in such filth and dysfunction.  The military DOES NOT take care of it&#039;s own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to the Dad, I do have concern his son will pay a price. This isn&#8217;t the NCO&#8217;s fault, the buildings are old and discussion but not action has been going on for years.  It is the top brass&#8217;s fault.  Buildings go up here in town in a matter of weeks complete start to finish, no excuse whatsoever for these guys to come home and live in such filth and dysfunction.  The military DOES NOT take care of it&#8217;s own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dori Lyman</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41473</link>
		<dc:creator>Dori Lyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 14:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41473</guid>
		<description>It sounds like things are moving in the right direction - at least for some.  There is no mention of another issue coming from this whole ordeal.  My son is station at Fort Bragg - lived until Tuesday in a decent barracks.  Tues morning he and other married Soldiers were given 2 hours to find another place to live as Soldiers from the &quot;condemned&quot; barracks were being moved to other barracks.  Apparently there are not enough rooms.  Two hours notice to leave, he had to put his personal belongings in storage and find a motel - paying with his own money!  Eventually the housing money will reimburse him and the other married Soldiers.  I find this outrageous, at least the Army could have picked up the tab for the motels. I hope this comes to &quot;light&quot; as well, I know I am writing to my Senators to correct this outrageous situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds like things are moving in the right direction &#8211; at least for some.  There is no mention of another issue coming from this whole ordeal.  My son is station at Fort Bragg &#8211; lived until Tuesday in a decent barracks.  Tues morning he and other married Soldiers were given 2 hours to find another place to live as Soldiers from the &#8220;condemned&#8221; barracks were being moved to other barracks.  Apparently there are not enough rooms.  Two hours notice to leave, he had to put his personal belongings in storage and find a motel &#8211; paying with his own money!  Eventually the housing money will reimburse him and the other married Soldiers.  I find this outrageous, at least the Army could have picked up the tab for the motels. I hope this comes to &#8220;light&#8221; as well, I know I am writing to my Senators to correct this outrageous situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41467</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41467</guid>
		<description>Way to go, CA!  You&#039;ve known about this problem for how many years and your only answer was to tell the soldiers not to sweep?  Ever hear of a wet mop?  Picks up dirt without causing dust clouds.

You knew about this, you knew it didn&#039;t get fixed, you knew about this again, you knew it didn&#039;t get fixed.

Maybe you&#039;re part of the problem.

How&#039;s this for a root cause in limited barracks space:  the contractors take their sweet-assed time to build the barracks.  In the last two years, I&#039;ve seen civilian builders working here on the university put up brand new &quot;suites&quot; that could easily house a brigade&#039;s worth of enlisted.  They are VERY nice.  I&#039;ll bet they&#039;re being paid less than the guys working on Bragg, and there are bonuses for finishing ahead of schedule, and penalties for finishing behind schedule.  Anyone know what happens when a contractor goes over estimate on time or budget--the Army extends their contract, and they work on &quot;insha allah&quot; time.

The young man&#039;s father had every right to be pissed off, and dad&#039;s chain of command is dad... congress/youtube.  Good on him for shining the light, it&#039;s the best disinfectant.

--Chuck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way to go, CA!  You&#8217;ve known about this problem for how many years and your only answer was to tell the soldiers not to sweep?  Ever hear of a wet mop?  Picks up dirt without causing dust clouds.</p>
<p>You knew about this, you knew it didn&#8217;t get fixed, you knew about this again, you knew it didn&#8217;t get fixed.</p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;re part of the problem.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s this for a root cause in limited barracks space:  the contractors take their sweet-assed time to build the barracks.  In the last two years, I&#8217;ve seen civilian builders working here on the university put up brand new &#8220;suites&#8221; that could easily house a brigade&#8217;s worth of enlisted.  They are VERY nice.  I&#8217;ll bet they&#8217;re being paid less than the guys working on Bragg, and there are bonuses for finishing ahead of schedule, and penalties for finishing behind schedule.  Anyone know what happens when a contractor goes over estimate on time or budget&#8211;the Army extends their contract, and they work on &#8220;insha allah&#8221; time.</p>
<p>The young man&#8217;s father had every right to be pissed off, and dad&#8217;s chain of command is dad&#8230; congress/youtube.  Good on him for shining the light, it&#8217;s the best disinfectant.</p>
<p>&#8211;Chuck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim b</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/#comment-41455</link>
		<dc:creator>jim b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=2724#comment-41455</guid>
		<description>What a surprise to the BG eh. I bet he had to cancel his &quot;T-off time&quot; He hates when that happens.

I too have a son at Bragg. The only surprise here is that the General pretends to be surprised. He must have made a career of not walking through barracks and ignoring soldiers.

I scanned the official response, I bet the only real changes made here is: I am sure BG Denny Rogers will fix this ASAP. First, he will make Ed Frawley%u2019s son sorry he ever let his dad in the barracks. Second, he will enact an order outlawing video cameras in barracks as some kinda operational security issue. Third, he will claim that the problem is fixed .. but it won%u2019t be.

Hoorah General R.O.A.D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a surprise to the BG eh. I bet he had to cancel his &#8220;T-off time&#8221; He hates when that happens.</p>
<p>I too have a son at Bragg. The only surprise here is that the General pretends to be surprised. He must have made a career of not walking through barracks and ignoring soldiers.</p>
<p>I scanned the official response, I bet the only real changes made here is: I am sure BG Denny Rogers will fix this ASAP. First, he will make Ed Frawley%u2019s son sorry he ever let his dad in the barracks. Second, he will enact an order outlawing video cameras in barracks as some kinda operational security issue. Third, he will claim that the problem is fixed .. but it won%u2019t be.</p>
<p>Hoorah General R.O.A.D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  militarygear.com/asp/2008/04/30/fort-bragg-barracks-interview/feed/ ) in 0.58099 seconds, on May 23rd, 2012 at 10:07 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on May 23rd, 2012 at 11:07 am UTC -->
