< Return to MilitaryGear.com
All Posts Information June 12 2008
 — By CJ

I wanted to share this email exchange I recently. I won’t say with whom I had it, but it started with this comment in response to my Stop Loss post on the VAMC Blog: “Did I miss something? Did Congress declare war recently?”

I’m sure you’ve heard this argument many times yourselves. Well, here’s my answer.

I guess my answer would be that the contract says in the event of war, not in the event of a declaration of war!! Semantics? Yes. But, we’re fighting right? When was the last time Congress officially “declared war” anyway? WWII? Also, I would ask how you “declare war” on a philosophy (like terrorism)? Since a “declaration of war” is a formal performative speech act or signing of a document by an authorised party of a government in order to initate a state of war between two or more nations, I would say that Congress “declared war” back on October 16, 2002, when they signed Public Law No: 107-243 authorizing the use of force against Iraq. Check the similarities in language between the Iraq declaration and the Japan declaration:

WWII-Japan: “the President is hereby authorized and directed to employ the entire naval and military forces of the United States and the resources of the Government to carry on war against the Imperial Government of Japan; and to bring the conflict to a successful termination, all of the resources of the country are hereby pledged by the Congress of the United states” Nowhere in the authorization to use force do the words “declaration of war” exist. They use the term, “state of war”.

Iraq: “the President is authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States as he determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to…defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq.”

Germany “declared war” on the United States and thus the Congress reciprocated. The same goes with the state of war being declared against Italy, who “declared war” against us first. At little long winded, but I would say that Congress DID “declare war” six years ago.

(5) Readers Comments

  1. Stop loss is up to the DOD. If people want to cry over it. READ THE CONTRACT THAT YOU SIGNED!!!!!

  2. I see darker clouds coming….

    The US Spreme Court, in a 5-4 decision, has ruled that al Qaeda operatives and terrorists held in detention at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba have the right to challenge their detention in federal court..

    The demofarts in the US loved this ruling. It brought us closer to the EU. After this our soliders might have to read the Miranda warning before they defend them self’s.

    I am buying more AMMO.

  3. Congress has never declared “war” to describe the current situation in which we find ourselves mired. Therefore there is no reason for stop-loss. There is no national emergency nor is there any national crisis that warrants implementation of stop-loss. Semper Fi.

  4. JD, the situation we find ourselves in now is the aftereffect of the war. We are fulfilling our law of war mandated legal requirements for nation building. The Soldiers have not been redeployed, so stop loss is necessary. Do you not watch the news and see that, though much better than ever in the past four years, we’re still fighting and need troops to maintain the peace we rebuilt. Stop-loss does not require a national emergency.

  5. If the Democrats want us to leave Iraq so much, then why don’t they just reverse Public Law No: 107-243? It’s not like they don’t have the numbers or the power to do it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>