<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DADT Statement From Other Milbloggers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers</link>
	<description>The Web’s Leading Military Blog Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:26:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Vee</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-84527</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Vee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 08:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-84527</guid>
		<description>FIGHT THIS!

Greetings, Men and Machines,

You can shrug your shoulders and allow the Leftists and homosexuals to destroy the U.S. Military and thereafter, American society, OR you can join the fight and roll DADT Repeal back.  

Check out the FACEBOOK pages of RESTORE DADT for discussion and REINSTATE DADT for coordination and counter-action planning.

Our objective is to serve as rallypoints for all those interested in fighting the repeal.  

For my own part, I am contacting the likes of the Alliance Defense Fund, Center for Military Readiness, Edmund Burke Institute for American Renewal, the Family Research Council, FRCAction, the Liberty Counsel / Freedom Federation, Save California, The Thomas More Law Center, as well as members of Congress, the new media and retired military.

We have the numbers.  The only question is, do we have the will?

Semper Fi,

Rick Vee</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIGHT THIS!</p>
<p>Greetings, Men and Machines,</p>
<p>You can shrug your shoulders and allow the Leftists and homosexuals to destroy the U.S. Military and thereafter, American society, OR you can join the fight and roll DADT Repeal back.  </p>
<p>Check out the FACEBOOK pages of RESTORE DADT for discussion and REINSTATE DADT for coordination and counter-action planning.</p>
<p>Our objective is to serve as rallypoints for all those interested in fighting the repeal.  </p>
<p>For my own part, I am contacting the likes of the Alliance Defense Fund, Center for Military Readiness, Edmund Burke Institute for American Renewal, the Family Research Council, FRCAction, the Liberty Counsel / Freedom Federation, Save California, The Thomas More Law Center, as well as members of Congress, the new media and retired military.</p>
<p>We have the numbers.  The only question is, do we have the will?</p>
<p>Semper Fi,</p>
<p>Rick Vee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OWB</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-62341</link>
		<dc:creator>OWB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jun 2010 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-62341</guid>
		<description>Would have to agree, CJ.  This is just another front/tactic from the progressive movement to disrupt and distract.  Too bad so many milbloggers took the bait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would have to agree, CJ.  This is just another front/tactic from the progressive movement to disrupt and distract.  Too bad so many milbloggers took the bait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DADT Flip Flopper (Or am I?)</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-61653</link>
		<dc:creator>DADT Flip Flopper (Or am I?)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 05:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-61653</guid>
		<description>[...] my last post on A Soldier&#8217;s Perspective, I&#8217;ve done a lot of thinking about the whole DADT debate and I think I&#8217;ve changed my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my last post on A Soldier&#8217;s Perspective, I&#8217;ve done a lot of thinking about the whole DADT debate and I think I&#8217;ve changed my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dino S.</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60748</link>
		<dc:creator>Dino S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 02:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60748</guid>
		<description>@Zoe, yes General Omar Bradley said the same thing about the US Military not being used as a laboratory for social experimentation. He said it back in 1948, but he was talking about keeping the military segregated based on race. You can discount the similiarities all you want, but in 1948 when President Harry Truman issued an executive order to integrate the armed forces he was met with the SAME arguments against it...morale, unit cohesion. Besides Zoe, it IS happening in the near future NOT ten years.  If congress does not repeal DADT this year there will likely be a stop-loss order by the Commander-in-Chief to freeze discharges. The Pentagon Working Group have a number of people working full time to integrate openly gay and lesbian service members into the US Military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Zoe, yes General Omar Bradley said the same thing about the US Military not being used as a laboratory for social experimentation. He said it back in 1948, but he was talking about keeping the military segregated based on race. You can discount the similiarities all you want, but in 1948 when President Harry Truman issued an executive order to integrate the armed forces he was met with the SAME arguments against it&#8230;morale, unit cohesion. Besides Zoe, it IS happening in the near future NOT ten years.  If congress does not repeal DADT this year there will likely be a stop-loss order by the Commander-in-Chief to freeze discharges. The Pentagon Working Group have a number of people working full time to integrate openly gay and lesbian service members into the US Military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoe Brain</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60689</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoe Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 10:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60689</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t have to worry. Obama didn&#039;t request that repeal of DADT be put in this year&#039;s defence budget. That means the military study will have to be completed first. Then there&#039;s the half-term elections, when the Dems will get massacred in the polls.

So DADT will be in place for at least another 10 years - Obama&#039;s remaining term, then the 2-term Republican president after him (no way is a Republican president going to sign off on a bill repealing DADT even if it does get passed).

AS Col. Householder put it so aptly:
&quot;The Army is not a sociological laboratory; to be effective it must be organized and trained according to the principles which will insure success. Experiments to meet the wishes and demands of the champions of every race and creed for the solution of their problems are a danger to efficiency, discipline and morale and would result in ultimate defeat.&quot;

I&#039;m sure many here would agree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t have to worry. Obama didn&#8217;t request that repeal of DADT be put in this year&#8217;s defence budget. That means the military study will have to be completed first. Then there&#8217;s the half-term elections, when the Dems will get massacred in the polls.</p>
<p>So DADT will be in place for at least another 10 years &#8211; Obama&#8217;s remaining term, then the 2-term Republican president after him (no way is a Republican president going to sign off on a bill repealing DADT even if it does get passed).</p>
<p>AS Col. Householder put it so aptly:<br />
&#8220;The Army is not a sociological laboratory; to be effective it must be organized and trained according to the principles which will insure success. Experiments to meet the wishes and demands of the champions of every race and creed for the solution of their problems are a danger to efficiency, discipline and morale and would result in ultimate defeat.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure many here would agree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XBradTC</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60649</link>
		<dc:creator>XBradTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 21:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60649</guid>
		<description>CJ, go ahead and add me as a signatory to your statement. 

I am of the opinion that very many of the gay servicemembers would indeed be able to perform in a manner consistent with the highest standards of the service. 

My real concern is the Diversity Industry would have a field day. 

Further, I do not see that the repeal of DADT would benefit the force to an extent that would outweigh the disruption caused. 

If it doesn&#039;t help the fight, why do it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CJ, go ahead and add me as a signatory to your statement. </p>
<p>I am of the opinion that very many of the gay servicemembers would indeed be able to perform in a manner consistent with the highest standards of the service. </p>
<p>My real concern is the Diversity Industry would have a field day. </p>
<p>Further, I do not see that the repeal of DADT would benefit the force to an extent that would outweigh the disruption caused. </p>
<p>If it doesn&#8217;t help the fight, why do it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mew</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60619</link>
		<dc:creator>Mew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 15:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60619</guid>
		<description>My question is, should the policy be changed how many of the Gay folks that are fighting for the change will actually sign up and join the military?   Will there be a large influx of Gays wanting to serve?  Probably not.  Is this really about being openly Gay to serve your country or about a win under their belt?

The way I see it this is just another battle like allowing photo ops at Dover.  Once that was reversed how many photographers are at Dover showing flagged draped coffins?  It&#039;s all PC.

Listen to the boots on the ground, if they want DADT reversed then do it, if they don&#039;t then leave the policy as it is.  They are the ones that will have to deal and live w/the changes.  Sometimes the best thing is to leave well enough alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question is, should the policy be changed how many of the Gay folks that are fighting for the change will actually sign up and join the military?   Will there be a large influx of Gays wanting to serve?  Probably not.  Is this really about being openly Gay to serve your country or about a win under their belt?</p>
<p>The way I see it this is just another battle like allowing photo ops at Dover.  Once that was reversed how many photographers are at Dover showing flagged draped coffins?  It&#8217;s all PC.</p>
<p>Listen to the boots on the ground, if they want DADT reversed then do it, if they don&#8217;t then leave the policy as it is.  They are the ones that will have to deal and live w/the changes.  Sometimes the best thing is to leave well enough alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cassy Fiano</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60503</link>
		<dc:creator>Cassy Fiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 20:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60503</guid>
		<description>[...] A Soldiers Perspective Statement from other milbloggers AGAINST repealing DADT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A Soldiers Perspective Statement from other milbloggers AGAINST repealing DADT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell for Idiots &#124; Hooah Wife and friends</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60459</link>
		<dc:creator>Don&#8217;t Ask Don&#8217;t Tell for Idiots &#124; Hooah Wife and friends</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60459</guid>
		<description>[...] and the statement have other links too): Gay Patriot TC Override Center for Military Readiness A Soldiers&#8217; Perspective Susan Katz Keating Milblogging.com  This Ain&#8217;t Hell Hot Air Blackfive   Share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and the statement have other links too): Gay Patriot TC Override Center for Military Readiness A Soldiers&#8217; Perspective Susan Katz Keating Milblogging.com  This Ain&#8217;t Hell Hot Air Blackfive   Share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeS</title>
		<link>http://militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/#comment-60409</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://militarygear.com/asp/?p=8964#comment-60409</guid>
		<description>I am not Military but I feel that the Military is the premier institution in all of American culture.

I have enjoyed BlackFive since its inception. I agree with all the statements in Uncle Jimbo&#039;s introduction to this issue, up to the conclusion.

The only point of disagreement is the issue of privacy. In all my conversations with service members, showering and sleeping is a major issue. Most equate this with women showering with men.

The current policy allows anyone to serve. The only people being excluded have excluded themselves, seemingly for political reasons. 

The Military does not seem to pursue. Sex of any kind is out of bounds. 

This present policy was a difficult compromise to fashion but it seems the only policy that gives everyone some degree of acceptance.

I definitely do not feel that this president is making this change because he has any respect for the institution of the Military. To him, it is clearly payback for the political support of the gay community. (As is the nomination of Elena Kagan. It seems that a Justice Kagan will push for protected status for homosexuality of all persuasions.)

Perhaps it would be best to wait for a Commander in Chief that seems to have the best intentions of the Military at heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not Military but I feel that the Military is the premier institution in all of American culture.</p>
<p>I have enjoyed BlackFive since its inception. I agree with all the statements in Uncle Jimbo&#8217;s introduction to this issue, up to the conclusion.</p>
<p>The only point of disagreement is the issue of privacy. In all my conversations with service members, showering and sleeping is a major issue. Most equate this with women showering with men.</p>
<p>The current policy allows anyone to serve. The only people being excluded have excluded themselves, seemingly for political reasons. </p>
<p>The Military does not seem to pursue. Sex of any kind is out of bounds. </p>
<p>This present policy was a difficult compromise to fashion but it seems the only policy that gives everyone some degree of acceptance.</p>
<p>I definitely do not feel that this president is making this change because he has any respect for the institution of the Military. To him, it is clearly payback for the political support of the gay community. (As is the nomination of Elena Kagan. It seems that a Justice Kagan will push for protected status for homosexuality of all persuasions.)</p>
<p>Perhaps it would be best to wait for a Commander in Chief that seems to have the best intentions of the Military at heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  militarygear.com/asp/2010/05/12/dadt-statement-from-other-milbloggers/feed/ ) in 0.59524 seconds, on Feb 10th, 2012 at 12:17 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 10th, 2012 at 1:17 am UTC -->
